Rosenborg BK is experiencing once again that attention is being diverted from what is happening on the pitch and onto internal power struggles. Now there are demands for the chairman to resign, and if not, it is threatened with an extraordinary general meeting. The timing could hardly be worse. Rosenborg is facing one of its most important decisions in many years. The club will set its course for the future after a challenging period, and the question of the coaching team, sporting direction, and organization will be addressed. Just then, some members choose to create even more unrest around the club's leadership. What makes the situation even more serious is the consequences that can arise from this. When distrust is directed at the chairman in this way, one risks not only losing one person. The result is that the entire board sets its positions at disposal. Suddenly, Rosenborg is in danger of losing both continuity, experience, and management in a period where the club needs it most. I am genuinely wondering if those who have promoted this demand really understand what they have set in motion – and how harmful this can be to the club. It's no longer about one person or one issue. It's about the stability of the entire Rosenborg BK. One can be critical of the board. One can be critical of the decisions that have been made. That is a natural part of member democracy. But it does not mean that every disagreement should end in demands for resignation and threats of extraordinary meetings. In the last 15 years, Rosenborg has suffered from a lack of continuity. Coaches have come and gone. Sporting leaders have been replaced. Strategies have been started and abandoned before they had time to work. The result is what we see today: Rosenborg has not managed to establish the stability that clubs like Bodø/Glimt and Viking have built their success on. Now we risk making the same mistake at the board level. What kind of signal does it send to potential coaches, employees, sponsors, and players when they see a club that is still plagued by internal unrest? Which coach wants to enter a project where uncertainty is created around both leadership and organization before the work has even started? Football is about more than the 90 minutes on the pitch. It's also about culture, trust, and stability. The best clubs build stone by stone over time. They do not tear down the foundation every time adversity comes. Therefore, it is difficult to understand what those who are now pushing for more unrest really want to achieve. Do they really think that another internal conflict will make Rosenborg stronger? That even more noise around the club will make it easier to recruit the right people? Rosenborg needs unity, not division. The club needs working space to make the right decisions for the future. Not least now, when the sporting leadership is facing decisions that will affect the club for many years to come. Every time Rosenborg gets caught up in internal turmoil, it's the club that loses. And right now, Rosenborg doesn't have the resources for more self-inflicted setbacks.